Templates

Beberapa templates boleh dimuatturun di sini untuk faedah kita bersama. Sekiranya anda juga mempunyai templates untuk dikongsi bersama, bolehlah hantar kepada saya untuk saya upload dan kita kongsi bersama. Terima kasih.

1. Borang 14A - Pindah milik

2. Borang 16A - Gadaian

3. Borang 16D - Notis Keingkaran Gadaian

4. Borang 16N - Melepaskan Gadaian

5. Borang 19B - Memasukkan Kaveat Persendirian

6. Borang 19G - Menarik Balik Kaveat Persendirian

7. Borang 378 - Tukar Nama

8. Deed of Assignment (By Way of Transfer)

9. Deed of Assignment (By Way of Love and Affection)

10. Deed of Receipt and Reassignment

11. Deed of Revocation

12. Form Consent to Transfer (Gombak land office)

13. Form Consent to Charge (Gombak land office)

14. Letter request of redemption statement

15. Letter of undertaking to refund by vendor

16. Letter of extension of time by vendor

17. Trust Deed

18. Wasiat

19. Surat Pengisytiharan Hibah

20. Construction Agreement

21. Renovation Agreement (Malay)

Sila ambil perhatian bahawa contoh-contoh yang diberikan di sini hanyalah sebagai rujukan sahaja dan tidak boleh diambil dan ditiru sewenang-wenangnya tanpa berbincang dengan peguam anda terlebih dahulu.

Kami tidak bertanggungjawab di atas sebarang kerugian yang anda alami sekiranya anda hanya menggunakan contoh yang diberi tanpa membuat rujukan pada pihak yang sebenarnya.

Sebagai panduan, untuk memuatturun contoh-contoh dokumen di atas, anda hendaklah terlebih dahulu menjadi ahli bagi docstoc. Sila layari www.docstoc.com dan daftar sebagai ahli. Selepas itu, buat carian dokumen yang ingin anda muatturn. Selepas menjumpai dokumen tersebut, klik butang "download this document". Simpan dokumen anda dalam folder pilihan anda.

Contact My Office

If you have any questions and/or comments, kindly fill up the form below and submit to my office.

Subject: * E-mail Address: * Your Name Your Questions/Comments * * Required Create Email Forms

Umno succeeds in setting aside RM218mil default judgement

(Bernama) - Umno today (21st January 2009) succeeded in its bid to set aside a judgment in default obtained by a merchandise supplier against the party in relation to the provision of RM218 million worth of election merchandise. High Court deputy registrar Ahmad Faizadh Yahaya made the order with costs in chambers after allowing Umno's application to set aside the judgment, issued on July 17 last year, ordering the party to pay Elegant Advisory Sdn Bhd RM218 million, interest and costs.

The company sought the judgment after Umno failed to respond to its suit.

Datuk Mohd Hafarizam Harun, counsel for Umno, told reporters that he would file a conditional memorandum of appearance to enable him to apply to strike out the company's writ of summons and statement of claim.

Elegant Advisory filed the civil suit in June 23 last year naming Umno treasurer Datuk Seri Abdul Azim Mohd Zabidi and the party as defendants.

Mohd Hafarizam said the deputy registrar had accepted Abdul Azim's claim, enclosed in his application to set aside the judgment in default, that the writ of summons and statement of claim were initiated without complying with Order 10 Rule 1 of the High Court Rules 1980 and Section 9 (c) of the Societies Act.

He said the documents were not personally served on the defendants, he said.

Moreover, Elegant Advisory had named the wrong party as defendant, he said, adding that it should have named the party's public officer and not the Umno treasurer.

In its writ of summons filed via Messrs Termizi & Co, the company said it was involved in supplying election merchandise, transport service and publications and had supplied Umno with the items for the 11th general election in 2004 upon the request of Abdul Azim.

It claimed that that since Abdul Azim had requested for supply in large quantities and within a short period of time, this resulted in the company appointing third parties (printing companies and other suppliers) to deliver the items on time and Abdul Azim had full knowledge of this.

The company had sent invoices for a sum of RM218,013,475 to Abdul Azim for payment and on May 22, 2004, a letter was sent to the defendant but it still failed to obtain payment, it said.

Besides the RM218 million, Elegant Advisory is also seeking 8% annual interest from the date of filing of the writ until settlement of the case.

Elegant Advisory was represented by counsel Mohd Nazruddin Abdullah. -- The Sun

Kena saman sebab pakai serban

KOTA BHARU, 19 Jan (Hrkh) - Seorang pelajar pondok sanggup memilih untuk menjalani hukuman penjara daripada membayar denda RM90 setelah disabit bersalah kerana menunggang motosikal tanpa memakai topi keledar.

Sedangkan ketika ditahan polis beliau memakai serban.

Ahmad Nasir Darus, 27 memilih menjalani hukuman penjara selepas Majistret Tengku Amalin A'Ishah Putri memutuskan dikenakan hukuman denda RM90 atau menjalani hukuman penjara dua hari.

Bagaimanapun di atas alasan memegang prinsip demi mempertahankan sunnah Rasulullah saw beliau lebih sanggup ditahan di penjara.

Keputusan itu dibuat majistret setelah meneliti keterangan pihak pendakwaan dan pembelaan serta hujahan bertulis yang dikemukakan.

Mahkamah mendapati pihak pembela gagal membuktikan keraguan yang munasabah dan tiada keterangan saksi-saksi lain yang dapat mengesahkan Ahmad Nasir seorang lebai.

Bagaimanapun pelajar pondok itu yang diwakili peguam Ahmad Rizal Effande Zainol memohon kepada mahkamah untuk menangguhkan pelaksanaan hukuman tersebut bagi membolehkan rayuan dikemukakan di Mahkamah Tinggi.

Namun mahkamah menolak permohonan peguam dan mengekalkan keputusan asal. Pendakwaan kes tersebut dikendalikan Pegawai Pendakwa, Cif Inspektor Mohd Yusri Mamat.

Ahmad Rizal ketika ditemui di luar mahkamah memberitahu beliau menyerahkan kepada anak guamnya untuk memilih sama ada ingin membayar denda atau sebaliknya.

Katanya, anak guamnya merasakan dirinya tidak bersalah kerana ia hanya mempertahankan sunah Rasulullah saw dengan memakai serban.

Oleh itu beliau akan memfailkan permohonan rayuan ke Mahkamah Tinggi dalam masa terdekat.

"Saya akan membawa kes ini ke Mahkamah Tinggi bagi dijadikan bahan akademik dan rujukan kerana terdapat kekaburan pada istilah 'lebai' dalam peruntukan undang-undang," katanya.

Perkarangan mahkamah dipenuhi hampir 100 rakan Ahmad Nasir yang datang untuk memberikan sokongan moral.

Pada 20 September dua tahun lalu Ahmad Nasir disaman di Jalan Pasir Tumboh atas kesalahan menunggang motosikal tanpa memakai topi keledar sebaliknya memakai serban.

Beliau disaman kerana melakukan kesalahan yang bertentangan dengan Kaedah 4 Motosikal (topi keledar keselamatan) 1973 dan boleh dihukum di bawah Seksyen 119 (2) Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 (Akta 333/87) dibaca bersama dengan Seksyen 128(1) akta yang sama.

Ketika dihadapkan ke mahkamah pada 4 November 2007 beliau membuat pengakuan tidak bersalah serta mohon dibicarakan.

Merit or Technicality; which one should prevail?

[1997] 2 MLJ 565 - Lai Yoke Ngan & Anor v Chin Teck Kwee & Anor

Judgement - Mohd Azmi

"While the procedural requirements in relation to applications to commit and committal orders are there to be obeyed and to protect the contemnor, if there is non-compliance with the requirements which does not prejudice the contemnor, to set aside the order purely on the grounds of technicality is contrary to the interests of justice. As long as the order made by the judge was a valid order, the approach of this court will be to uphold the order in the absence of any prejudice or injustice to the contemnor as a consequence of doing so."

"In the present case, it is necessary to see the purpose of the rule in breach of which judgment was entered. If the requirements of O 13 r 6(1) are a mere technicality, as was contended by En Das, then the judge ought to have properly disregarded the breach and permitted the judgment to stand." 

[1978] 2 MLJ 57 – KHOO KAY HOCK v E J KETTING & ORS

Judgement - Raja Azlan Shah

"In the present case the plaintiff issued his writ and served it on the defendants well within time. They knew perfectly well that the plaintiff was claiming damages for negligently causing the death of the deceased at the Penang Adventist Hospital. Yet they seek to bar him on the most technical point — just because he omitted to indorse the words “for the benefit of the dependants, etc.” on the writ. We do not think that we should allow this technical objection to prevail. We should apply the well-known words of Holroyd Pearce LJ in Pontin v Wood (supra , page 297) when he said that the court would give its aid “to regularising the procedure of a known genuine case commenced before the time limit expired but containing technical defects”. That in our opinion will fully satisfy O 20 r 4 which reads:

 “Whenever a statement of claim is delivered the plaintiff may therein alter, modify, or extend his claim without any, amendment of the indorsement of the writ.”

 "We feel the learned judge had failed to direct his mind within the ambit of this general rule."

ARE LAWYERS COVERED BY MONEY LAUNDERING LEGISLATION?

Article 47 of Anti Money Laundering Act 2001 (Act 613):

47. Advocates and solicitors to disclose information.

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, a Judge of the High Court may, on application being made to him in relation to an investigation into any offence under subsection 4(1), order an advocate and solicitor to disclose information available to him in respect of any transaction or dealing relating to any property which is liable to seizure under this Act.

(2) Nothing in subsection (1) shall require an advocate and solicitor to comply with any order under that subsection to the extent that such compliance would disclose any privileged information or communication which came to his knowledge for the purpose of any pending proceedings.

NAME LAWS REGARDING ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROCEDURES

Anti Money Laundering Act 2001 (Act 613) (AMLA)

The AMLA, which came into force on 15 January 2002 criminalises money laundering of proceeds from the predicate offences and provides for suspicious transaction reporting, record-keeping and the functions of a financial intelligence unit that could co-operate with domestic as well as foreign enforcement agencies. The law also provides for investigation into money laundering activities, law enforcement agencies to freeze, seize and forfeit proceeds from predicate offences as well as prosecution of money launderers. Advocate & Solicitor is defined as one of the ‘Reporting Institution’ under the Anti Money Laundering Act 2001

The AMLA was amended and the amendment was gazetted as law in December 2003 in line with the amendment to the Penal Code to deal with terrorism financing. Under Section 130 (o) of the Penal Code, lawyers and accountants would be committing an offence if they provide financial services or facilities to any terrorist, terrorist entity or terrorist group wherein they know or have reasonable grounds to believe that that in whole or in part the services or facilities will be used or will benefit any terrorist, terrorist entity or terrorist group.

---

LAWYER RESPONSIBILITY/LIABILITY

Failure to report a suspicious transaction is an offence which carries a maximum fine of RM250,000 imposed under the AMLA.

The law provides civil and criminal immunity for persons disclosing or supplying information pursuant to the Act, except where it is done in bad faith.

The legal professional privilege between the Advocate & Solicitor and his/her client is overridden by the Act for the purposes of the reporting obligation and will not excuse the Advocate & Solicitor from any failure to report a suspicious transaction.

According to an amendment to the Penal Code, the penalty would be death if the Act results in death and in any other case with imprisonment for a term of not less than 7 years but not exceeding 30 years apart from a fine.

---

CLIENTS IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION

The Bar Council has set up the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Task Force and is in the process of introducing a set of guidelines and procedures for the implementation of Customer Due Diligence (CDD) – “Know Your Client”. Minimum information to be obtained from the client will include basic identification information, contact information, background information, country of origin, etc.

Jawatan Kosong; Kerani 'Conveyancing'

Firma guaman Termizi & Co. memerlukan seorang staf baru bagi menampung keperluan kerja-kerja perkeranian di pejabat. Keutamaan diberikan kepada mereka yang berpengalaman sekurang-kurangnya satu tahun dalam bidang 'conveyancing'.

Job scope kerani conveyancing mencakupi urusan perjanjian jual beli termasuk subsale, penyediaan dokumen perjanjian pinjaman dengan pihak bank terutamanya AmBank (M) Berhad (sebab Termizi & Co. adalah full panel dengan AmBank), dan apa-apa sahaja yang berkaitan dengan urusan conveyancing. Jawatan ini terhad untuk perempuan sahaja dan statusnya adalah full time permanent staff.

Jika ada sesiapa yang berminat bolehlah menghubungi Termizi & Co. di no. tel: 03-41055210, atau fax: 03-41055211, atau e-mail: mizico@streamyx.com / termizi_co@yahoo.com.my .

Sebagai permulaan, anda juga boleh mengisi borang dibawah dan klik butang 'submit' diakhir borang. Terima kasih.

Subject: * First Name: * Last Name: * Address: * City: * State: * AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY -Terr.- AS FM GU MI PR VI Zip: * Phone Number: * Cell Number: E-mail Address: * Best Time to Reach You: * Morning Afternoon Evening Night Position Applying For: * Available Start Date: * Highest Level of Education: * Primary School High School Diploma Some College Bachelors Degree Graduate / Masters Degree If you earned a college degree, please list the major: Previous Employer #1: Dates Employed: Supervisor Name: Phone: Job Duties at Previous Employer: Previous Employer #2: Dates Employed: Supervisor Name: Phone: Job Duties at Previous Employer: Additional Information: * Required Create Your Own Contact Form

Caruman Pekerja untuk KWSP hanya 8% bermula Januari 2009

Sila ambil makluman bahawa caruman KWSP untuk pekerja (ahli) akan dikurangkan sebanyak 3% daripada kadar biasa iaitu daripada 11% kepada 8%. Perubahan ini berkuatkuasa dari bulan Januari 2009 sehingga Disember 2010. Walau bagaimanapun, kadar caruman bagi majikan adalah kekal sebanyak 12%.

Bagi ahli yang ingin mengekalkan kadar caruman 11% bolehlah mengisi borang yang disediakan oleh KWSP.

Ahli yang ingin mengekalkan caruman pada kadar 11% boleh berbuat demikian dengan mengisi borang di bawah yang kini boleh diperolehi dari mana-mana Pejabat KWSP atau dimuat turun seperti dibawah.

1. Permohonan secara individu melalui:
Borang KWSP 17A (AHL) – Khas

ATAU

2. Permohonan secara berkumpulan melalui:
Borang KWSP 17AA (AHL) – Khas

Borang yang telah lengkap diisi hendaklah diserahkan kepada KWSP melalui majikan masing-masing.

Sila rujuk Bahagian A dan Bahagian B Jadual Ketiga Akta KWSP 1991 (Pindaan) 2008 untuk jadual caruman bulanan terbaru yang akan berkuatkuasa mulai 1 Januari 2009 hingga 31 Disember 2010.

Terima kasih.